The Men Calling Me "Bro" Treated Me Better Than the Men Calling Me "Baby."
- Eda Dolunay
- 2 days ago
- 7 min read

On almost every date I've been on lately, the exact same question inevitably comes up: "Do you have a lot of close male friends?" Every time I answer "yes," I feel like I'm being judged in an invisible courtroom. In today's dating world, having too many male friends is coded as the ultimate "red flag" for a woman. When I talk to my female friends, I realize the situation is even worse. So many men literally demand that you cut every guy out of your life before they even consider starting a serious relationship with you.
A friend of the opposite sex is almost always perceived as a potential threat to a relationship. So does this chronic suspicion come from personal insecurities and past traumas? Or is it fed by the narrow perspective society has taught us?
Our close male friends disrupt the "traditional order" that heterosexual relationships know so well. That toxic assumption we've all heard countless times kicks in: "If a guy is paying this much attention to a girl, there must be something else behind it." That's why, when you're in a relationship, your boyfriend often spends his time trying to decode the "hidden agenda" behind your male friends' behaviour, reassuring himself that nothing else is going on.
The other day, I experienced something that brought this absurd contrast into sharp focus.
I had to travel somewhere far out of town, and since I didn't want to make the trip by myself, I asked the guy I was talking to; or flirting with, to come with me. He refused. His reasoning was that my friends would be there, and he was bothered by the imagined discomfort of having to meet them.
So I asked one of my closest male friends instead. He picked me up from my house and made the entire trip with me. And he didn't just tag along; the whole way, he listened to my problems, my thoughts, and my dreams one by one. He wasn't doing it out of obligation either. He was genuinely interested, asking thoughtful questions about my life. When he noticed I'd forgotten to eat because of all the excitement, he bought food for us to share on the road, and we spent the drive singing songs together.
At one point that day, we even ran into the girl my friend; who had been driving me around, was flirting with. She was incredibly warm and sweet to him, but the same friend who treated me like I was the easiest person in the world to love suddenly became awkward, stiff, almost incapable of speaking around her. The guy who would patiently wait for me if I was running late saw this girl arriving late as borderline disrespectful, enough to make him reconsider the entire connection. If I missed his call because I was busy, his reaction was always, "You're probably overwhelmed. Is there anything I can do?" But when the girl he liked didn't answer his calls, he immediately interpreted it as rejection, as proof she simply didn't want him.
That night, when I finally got home, another one of my guy friends called me to vent about his own problems. We ended up talking for hours. He asked how my day had gone, told me to send his regards to my parents, and remembered the smallest details about my life. He was open, kind, and, most importantly, consistent. Before hanging up, we even planned our next hangout. He picked the place, set the time, and clearly told me he'd pick me up and drive me home.
And while I was sitting there wrapped in this very real sense of care and emotional depth, the guy I was actually flirting with was still sending me messages like "What are you doing?" or "What did you do today?" Dry, hollow texts completely stripped of curiosity, warmth, or intention. Compared to the men in my friendships, the men I dated often felt painfully surface-level.
But later that same night, while talking to my guy friends about their own love lives, I realized something deeply strange. The same men who were so responsible, attentive, sweet, and emotionally present with me somehow abandoned all of those qualities the second their feelings for a woman became romantic.
And that's when I started wondering whether attraction fundamentally changes the way straight men relate to women. Because emotional intelligence clearly exists. The attentiveness exists. The softness exists. I had experienced all of it firsthand. They just seemed to access it far more easily in friendship than in romance.
The real question, though, was: why?
I think the first reason lies in the paradox of ownership and freedom. Men cannot claim ownership over the lives, choices, or emotional space of the women they are simply friends with. And that absence of expectation completely disarms the male ego. The kindness that exists inside friendship becomes effortless, pure, almost instinctive. But the moment romance enters the equation, many men begin to see women as extensions of their own lives, desires, and validation. Kindness quickly turns into a power negotiation. Attention becomes conditional.
The second reason, I think, is what many people describe as "hunter mode." In romantic dynamics, many men operate with an objective-oriented mindset. Dating becomes either a race toward conquest or a constant exercise in managing uncertainty. Friendship has no finish line. There is no pressure to "win," no urgency to prove anything, no obsession with where things are going. And because of that, men suddenly have the mental space to truly listen to a woman, to remember tiny details about her life, and to care without strategy.
When dating, however, their minds often become occupied with a completely different set of questions:
Does she like me? Will this go somewhere? Will we sleep together? Maybe the irony is that the moment we stop viewing intimacy as a goal to unlock, we finally start relating to each other as actual human beings.
Then there's the comfort of emotional safety. Because of the roles men are conditioned into, vulnerability is often inaccessible between men. Female friendships become one of the only spaces where they can remove the performance, lower the armour, and exist emotionally unedited. To preserve that safe space, they invest deeply in their female friendships. But with the women they desire, the pressure to remain "cool," emotionally detached, or impossible to read transforms them into flatter, drier, far less authentic versions of themselves. In trying so hard to impress women, they somehow become completely disconnected from the very emotional depth women are searching for in the first place. And by the end of it all, they retreat behind the same tired excuse: women just don't understand us.
And for some reason, I couldn't stop thinking about that. Did a woman have to remain an untouchable friend to be treated like a fully realised human being in a man's world? Why did romance function less like a reward and more like an expiration date on kindness? Maybe men only knew how to treat women like queens inside the safe harbour of friendship. The moment a woman became a possibility, a goal, or a source of validation, that gentleness curdled into performance, ego, and emotionally vacant "wyd?" texts.
Or maybe love itself was the virus. The thing that quietly destroys the extraordinary softness that friendship is capable of holding.
And somewhere between bad dates and late-night voice notes, a very uncomfortable thought crossed my mind:
The men who called me "bro" somehow treated me more like a woman than the men calling me "baby." And maybe part of the discomfort around male-female friendships comes from something even darker. Many men are taught to see women primarily through the lens of attraction. So when they encounter a woman with close male friends, they struggle to imagine those friendships existing without hidden romantic motives because they themselves were never taught how to engage with women outside the framework of desire.
Which is ironic, because some of the healthiest and safest dynamics I've ever experienced with men existed precisely in friendships untouched by romantic expectation. There was no constant decoding. No territorial behaviour. No exhausting negotiation for power beneath every interaction. Just presence. Care. Reliability.
Many of my male friends make me feel safer than the men pursuing me romantically ever did.
If we go somewhere together, I know they'll make sure I get home safely. I know they'll notice if I've stopped eating because I'm stressed. I know they'll remember tiny details about my life weeks later without needing to be reminded. And somehow, all of that care feels more genuine precisely because it isn't attached to an outcome.
At the same time, I started realising that these friendships seemed healing for them too. Around each other, men are often taught to suppress vulnerability, flatten their emotions, and communicate through irony more than honesty. But with female friends, many men finally allow themselves softness without feeling weak for it. They vent. They open up. They talk about heartbreak, insecurities, family problems, and fears about the future. They become emotionally articulate in ways they rarely permit themselves to be anywhere else.
And maybe that's why friendships between men and women can feel so threatening to traditional dating dynamics. Because they expose how artificial so much heterosexual performance really is.
Because once attraction enters the room, many people stop relating to each other naturally. Men become performers. Women become evaluations. Every interaction starts carrying invisible stakes. Suddenly, people are no longer just listening, laughing, and existing together. They're managing impressions. Protecting their egos. Trying not to lose power before the other person does.
And maybe women feel this shift even more intensely because so many of us move through life constantly aware of the possibility of being sexualised. So finding men who treat you with genuine care without expecting access to your body, your attention, or your emotional labour in return can feel strangely healing. For a moment, you stop feeling like someone to conquer and start feeling like a person again.
Maybe that was the real reason I couldn't stop thinking about all of this. Because it forced me to confront an uncomfortable possibility: perhaps emotional intimacy thrives most in spaces untouched by ownership, expectation, and performance. Maybe friendship allows men to love women more honestly precisely because nothing is being extracted from the interaction. And maybe that's the tragedy of modern dating. The closer romance gets to possession, the further it drifts from tenderness.
Too many people learned how to pursue each other before they ever learned how to genuinely know one another. And maybe that's why the men who called me "bro" so often made me feel more protected, understood, respected, and emotionally seen than the men calling me "baby."
Not because friendship is inherently deeper than romance. But because sometimes friendship is the only place where people still remember how to treat each other like human beings before they start treating each other like goals.
Photo © via Pinterest
.png)











sooo good