Surveillance Has Entered Its It-Girl Era, You Ready?
- Camille Roe S.

- 2 days ago
- 3 min read

Surveillance capitalism used to look like something we were supposed to fear.It looked like CCTV cameras mounted on street corners, government databases, airport security checks, facial recognition software, Silicon Valley engineers collecting our data in anonymous office buildings. It felt cold, clinical and unmistakably dystopian. Surveillance belonged to governments, corporations and science fiction films. But now? Now it wears designer sunglasses.
That's what feels so unsettling about Meta's collaboration with Kylie Jenner on its AI glasses. Not simply that the glasses can discreetly record the people around you, or that they represent yet another expansion of surveillance technology into our everyday lives. It's that somewhere along the way, surveillance stopped looking like technology and started looking like fashion.
And maybe that's how every controversial idea becomes normal, not because we become convinced it's good, but because inevitably we become convinced it's beautiful.
For years, Meta's smart glasses struggled to capture people's imagination. They looked awkward, intrusive, vaguely unsettling. The cameras were impossible to ignore because the glasses themselves still looked like technology, and people questioned them because they still carried the visual language of surveillance.
So Meta didn't just redesign the product, no no, contrary it redesigned the feeling.Â
Give the glasses to a celebrity. Make them desirable. Make them fashionable. Turn them into something people don't just tolerate but actively aspire to own. Because humans rarely buy products based on logic alone; we buy stories, identities, and undoubtedly we buy the version of ourselves we believe those products might help us become.
And nobody understands that better than capitalism.We often think celebrities sell products, but in reality, they sell permission. Permission to wear something, to desire something and to stop questioning something.
The most valuable thing Kylie Jenner isn't selling is a pair of glasses, contrary she is selling cultural legitimacy, which she has a lot of with this generation of kids.Â
The conversation quietly shifts from Should this technology exist? to They actually look really good on her.
And that shift, my dear, matters far more than we realise, or perhaps care to admit. Even I caught myself having that exact thought. For a split second, I wasn't thinking about surveillance, privacy or ethics. I was thinking, Those actually look good. I had to stop myself and ask, Wait... why am I suddenly looking at the glasses instead of questioning what they represent?
Because the moment our attention shifts from ethics to aesthetics, the debate has already been won. We're no longer asking whether this technology makes society better. We're asking which colour we'd choose, whether the frame suits our face, whether we'd actually wear them. We're comparing outfits instead of consequences. The product hasn't changed, but the questions we're asking about it have.Â
And perhaps that's the scariest thing marketing has ever achieved. It doesn't convince us to change our minds, It simply distracts us long enough that we stop asking the questions that mattered in the first place.
Every controversial technology follows almost the same trajectory; at first it feels strange, uncomfortable, even dystopian. We resist it because it still looks unfamiliar. Then comes the redesign; meaning softer branding, better packaging, a famous face, and a carefully curated campaign. Then, almost overnight, the conversation stops being about what the technology does and starts being about how beautiful it looks, how seamlessly it fits into our lives, and whether we should get it in black or tortoiseshell.Â
The product stays exactly the same, only now the feeling changes, and once the feeling changes, resistance quietly disappears. Before you know it, you've spent $400 on a pair of surveillance glasses and somehow convinced yourself they're a fashion statement.
This is why celebrity has become one of the most powerful political tools of the twenty-first century. Celebrities no longer simply influence what we wear or what we buy. They influence what feels normal. They move ideas from the fringes of society into the centre of culture without ever needing to defend them.
Because aspiration is often more persuasive than argument. Nobody wakes up thinking, I'd love to participate in the expansion of surveillance capitalism. But millions of people wake up thinking, I want whatever she has. And capitalism understands that those two desires can become exactly the same thing.
.png)











Comments